top of page
Search

The AI Gold Rush: What History Teaches Us

Writer: Luke Lloyd
Luke Lloyd
May 28
5 min read

Updated: Sep 3

The AI Gold Rush: What History Teaches Us About Big Booms, Big Busts, and Big Winners

Every generation believes its technological revolution is different. In many ways, it is. But history has a funny way of rhyming.

Go back to the railroad boom of the 1800s. Railroads changed America forever. They shrank distance, fueled industrialization, created fortunes, and permanently altered commerce. Yet while railroads transformed society, investors learned a painful lesson: revolutionary technology does not guarantee every investment becomes a winner. Massive overbuilding, speculation, leverage, and unrealistic expectations led to spectacular booms—and equally spectacular busts.

Many railroad companies disappeared. Others consolidated. But the railroads themselves? They changed the world.

Fast forward to the radio boom of the 1920s. Investors poured money into anything remotely connected to broadcasting. Valuations exploded. New companies launched seemingly overnight. Radio ultimately revolutionized communication and advertising, but the frenzy around it created excess speculation. A transformative technology became surrounded by irrational exuberance.

Then came fiber optics in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Telecommunications firms laid enormous amounts of fiber cable across the country under the assumption internet demand would grow infinitely and immediately. In the long run, they were directionally right—the internet changed everything. But in the short run, they built far too much, too quickly. Capital flooded the industry, debt piled up, and many companies imploded when demand failed to match expectations on Wall Street’s timetable.

The shale revolution offers another fascinating example. Over the last 15 years, energy firms poured hundreds of billions into hydraulic fracturing and domestic oil production. America became an energy powerhouse, but investors discovered something important: tremendous innovation does not automatically mean tremendous shareholder returns. Many shale producers overspent, took on excessive debt, and failed to deliver sustainable profits despite changing the energy landscape forever.

A pattern emerges.

History often starts with a transformational idea. Then comes massive capital spending, investor enthusiasm, aggressive projections, overbuilding, and eventually a sorting process. Some companies fail. Some survive. A few dominate.

Which brings us to artificial intelligence.

Today, major technology firms are spending staggering amounts of money on AI infrastructure. Across hyperscalers, semiconductor firms, data center expansion, cloud providers, and software ecosystems, capital expenditures tied to AI are projected to exceed roughly $700 billion over the coming years. Data centers are being built at a pace rarely seen before. Companies are spending heavily on chips, energy infrastructure, fiber connectivity, software tools, and talent.

The scale feels historic because it is.

But history suggests something important for investors and financial planners to remember: just because a trend changes the world does not mean every company participating will thrive.

The railroad boom created economic transformation but wiped out countless investors who picked the wrong companies.

The dot-com era gave us Amazon and Google—but also thousands of businesses that no longer exist.

Fiber infrastructure ultimately proved necessary, but many early investors lost fortunes before profitability arrived.

AI will almost certainly reshape healthcare, finance, software, manufacturing, education, defense, logistics, and countless other industries. Productivity gains could be enormous. Entire business models may disappear while entirely new ones emerge.

But investors should separate technology winners from investment winners.

Those are not always the same thing.

The biggest spending company is not necessarily the biggest long-term winner. Sometimes infrastructure providers win. Sometimes software platforms dominate. Sometimes the companies enabling the ecosystem quietly outperform the flashy names grabbing headlines.

And sometimes expectations simply get too far ahead of reality.

This is where financial planning matters.

The temptation during every major cycle is to overconcentrate—to believe “this time is obvious” and load up on the hottest names after headlines and momentum have already pushed valuations higher. We saw it with railroads, radio, internet stocks, housing, crypto, and energy.

Smart investors recognize that innovation creates opportunity, but discipline creates wealth.

That means diversification still matters. Risk management still matters. Cash flow planning still matters. Time horizon still matters.

You do not need to perfectly predict the one ultimate AI winner to benefit from the broader transformation.

History teaches us that revolutions often create bubbles before creating durable wealth. The path is rarely linear. Booms tend to overshoot. Busts tend to scare people out at the wrong time. Then eventually, real winners emerge.

The lesson is not to avoid innovation.

The lesson is to respect cycles.

Because while technologies change, human behavior rarely does.

Click here to schedule a meeting — I’m here to help you take the next step toward financial freedom.

Colin Symons, CIO Lloyd Financial Group

ADP Employment was 36K vs. prev. 42K. Still fine.

Richmond Fed Manufacturing was 13 vs. exp. 4, with shipments strong.

Iran launched drones at commercial ships and the US struck back, helping cause some minor nervousness in markets.

Drone stocks are on the move after the WSJ said is considering offering funding deals. Unusual Machines (UMAC,) backed by Trump Jr., is up 41%, while Aerovironment (AVAV) is up 11%.

Salesforce (CRM) was -2%after missing revenue and revenue guidance. Interesting, the reaction is so small after other software companies have been hit hard for earnings like this.

PCE, Q2 GDP, Durable Goods Orders, Jobless Claims, and New Home Sales, today. Core PCE is the economic report of the week.

Bottom line: Modest step back in markets, again due to Iran

Click here to schedule a meeting — I’m here to help you take the next step toward financial freedom.

Disclosures/Regulation:

This content is intended to provide general information about Lloyd Financial. It is not intended to offer or deliver investment advice in any way. Information regarding investment services are provided solely to gain an understanding of our investment philosophy, our strategies and to be able to contact us for further information.

All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.

The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward‐looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.

Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk. Therefore, it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable

Want a clearer view of where you stand? Schedule a free portfolio analysis.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page