Faster, Tighter… and Potentially More Fragile, LFG Daily - February 27, 2026

Dream Bigger, Sleep Better

At Lloyd Financial Group, we’re constantly striving to give you more insight, more clarity, and more confidence when it comes to your money. Our Chief Investment Officer, Colin Symons, now delivers his own daily newsletter, offering deep analysis and a detailed outlook on the ever-changing investment world called Symons Says. Check it out and subscribe if you want a very detailed, daily analysis of the investment world. Colin has amazing content.

Meanwhile, the LFG Daily will continue to bring you quick, actionable summaries — blending market updates with financial planning and tax strategies to help you make smarter decisions every day. Together, they’re the perfect one-two punch: Colin brings the deep dive into Investments, we bring the daily edge.

Luke Lloyd, CEO Lloyd Financial Group

The Algorithmic Market: Faster, Tighter… and Potentially More Fragile

Walk onto a trading floor today and you won’t hear much shouting. You’ll hear servers humming.

More than 90% of daily stock market volume is now executed by algorithms—largely through market makers, high-frequency trading firms, and institutional systems reacting to price movements in milliseconds. At the same time, retail traders are using options and other derivatives at or near all-time highs as a percentage of total volume.

This isn’t your grandfather’s market.

The structure of the market itself has changed—and that has real implications for drawdowns, melt-ups, and how quickly information moves through the system.

Let’s break it down.

1. The Rise of Algorithmic Market Makers

Market makers today are highly automated firms that:

• Continuously quote bid and ask prices

• Adjust spreads in real time

• Hedge positions instantly

• React to order flow and volatility within microseconds

  
  

These systems are designed to provide liquidity and tighten spreads. In calm markets, that’s a good thing. Transaction costs are lower. Execution is faster. Markets are more efficient.

But here’s the trade-off:

Algorithms don’t have emotions—but they are programmed to respond to volatility.

When volatility spikes, many systems simultaneously:

• Widen spreads

• Pull liquidity

• De-lever exposure

• Increase hedging activity

  
  

That’s when things can get disorderly.

2. Retail Derivatives: The Options Explosion

At the same time algorithms dominate execution, retail traders have dramatically increased their use of:

• Weekly options

• Zero-days-to-expiration (0DTE) contracts

• Leveraged call and put strategies

  
  

Options activity has exploded because:

• Platforms made access easy

• Commissions went to zero

• Social media amplified short-term speculation

  
  

Options are leveraged instruments. That leverage creates feedback loops.

When retail traders buy call options:

• Market makers sell those calls

• Market makers hedge by buying the underlying stock

• That buying can push prices higher

  
  

This is called a gamma squeeze dynamic.

But it works in reverse too.

When markets fall and put buying increases:

• Market makers hedge by selling stock

• Selling pressure accelerates declines'

  
  

The result? Moves can become self-reinforcing.

3. So… Is the Market More Controlled or More Hectic?

The honest answer: both.

In Normal Conditions:

• Spreads are tighter

• Liquidity is deeper

• Information is priced almost instantly

• Volatility can actually be dampened

  
  

Algorithms create efficiency and stability when volatility is low.

When Things Go Wrong:

• Liquidity can disappear quickly

• Correlations spike

• Selling cascades accelerate

• Drawdowns become sharper and faster

  
  

We’ve seen this dynamic during flash crashes, pandemic selloffs, and rapid Fed repricing cycles.

Algorithms don’t panic—but they are programmed to reduce risk when volatility thresholds are breached. If many systems are coded similarly, they react similarly.

That creates herding behavior—just faster.

4. Does Information Move Faster?

Absolutely.

Earnings miss? Instantly priced.Geopolitical headline? Instantly repriced.Fed statement? Parsed by AI in milliseconds.

Information velocity has increased dramatically.

Is that good?

Pros:

• Less information asymmetry

• Harder for insiders to exploit lag

• More efficient pricing

  
  

Cons:

• Overreactions can happen instantly

• Markets can overshoot both directions

• Human investors have less time to think

  
  

In the old days, you might have had hours—or days—to assess a development. Today, the first move happens before you can read the headline.

5. Drawdowns: Faster, Sharper, but Often Shorter?

One structural shift worth noting:

Modern selloffs tend to be:

• Faster

• More violent

• But sometimes shorter in duration

  
  

Why?

Because once volatility stabilizes:

• Algorithms step back in

• Liquidity returns

• Passive flows resume

• Hedging flows reverse

  
  

The same mechanical forces that accelerate declines can fuel powerful rebounds.

That’s why recent markets have seen violent V-shaped recoveries.

6. What This Means for Investors

As someone who works in financial planning and portfolio strategy, here’s the key takeaway:

The plumbing of the market has changed—but the principles of wealth-building have not.

However, the environment requires discipline.

1. Expect Faster Swings

If you’re overleveraged, algorithm-driven volatility can expose you quickly.

2. Understand Liquidity Risk

In extreme moments, liquidity can thin out—especially in crowded trades.

3. Don’t Confuse Speed with Fundamentals

Just because prices move instantly doesn’t mean intrinsic value changed instantly.

4. Risk Management Is Non-Negotiable

When derivatives usage is elevated and systematic flows dominate, risk events can cascade.

7. The Bigger Philosophical Question

Are markets more fragile today?

They are likely more efficient—but structurally more reflexive.

We have:

• Algorithmic liquidity providers

• Retail leverage through derivatives

• Passive index concentration

• Instant global information transfer

  
  

That combination creates a market that is:

• Calm… until it isn’t.

• Stable… until volatility thresholds are hit.

• Efficient… but occasionally unstable.

  
  

The market isn’t more emotional.

It’s more mechanical.

And when mechanical systems hit stress limits, they move all at once.

Final Thought

For long-term investors, this environment reinforces one timeless principle:

Volatility is not risk. Permanent capital loss is risk.

Algorithms may dominate daily trading volume. Retail derivatives may amplify short-term swings.

But over decades, businesses—not trading systems—drive returns.

The machines determine the speed of the ride.

Fundamentals still determine the destination.

Don’t leave your financial future up to chance. Let’s build a plan that gives you confidence today and peace of mind for tomorrow. Click here to schedule a meeting — I’m here to help you take the next step toward financial freedom.

Colin Symons, CIO Lloyd Financial Group

Jobless Claims were better than expected across the board, with the headline 212K vs. exp. 216K and Continuing Claims 1833K vs. exp. 1858K

The KC Fed Manufacturing was 5 vs. exp. 2 with Production and New Orders up.

Iran and the US will continue talking on Monday after no deal was reached in Geneva. Still no attacking, though many still expect something will happen over the next two weeks.

After being up 5% overnight, NFLX ended down -5%. What does it mean? I don’t know. I’d say it largely described the full range of option expectations and seemed to attack the final section of the market that hadn’t yet been hit in a selloff, semis and memory. I guess we can kill the South Korean Kospi market.

Block (XYZ) was up 19% after firing 40% of staff in favor of AI, also causing more software (IGV) angst. Just a thought, maybe they shouldn’t have hired so aggressively post-covid in the first place? Remember when Dorsey’s last company, Twitter, got sold and Musk fired 80% of employees?

DELL was up 11% on strong earnings and guidance as AI server sales soared.

After a long saga, Warner Brothers (WBD) decided the Paramount Skydance (PSKY) deal to buy the company was superior to the Netflix (NFLX) offer. This has PSKY up 9% after hours, WBD -2%, and NFLX up 8%. Since this competition started on 12/5, NFLX is -16%, PSKY is -16%, and WBD is up 10%, none of which includes activity since last night’s close. Thanks for playing!

PPI and Chicago PMI, today.

What does it all mean? Iran angst continues, as does some lingering AI fears

Don’t leave your financial future up to chance. Let’s build a plan that gives you confidence today and peace of mind for tomorrow. Click here to schedule a meeting — I’m here to help you take the next step toward financial freedom.

Disclosures/Regulation:

This content is intended to provide general information about Lloyd Financial. It is not intended to offer or deliver investment advice in any way. Information regarding investment services are provided solely to gain an understanding of our investment philosophy, our strategies and to be able to contact us for further information.

All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.

The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward‐looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.

Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk. Therefore, it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable