Are You Over-Paying For Mutual Funds? LFG Daily - December 11, 2025

Dream Bigger, Sleep Better

At Lloyd Financial Group, we’re constantly striving to give you more insight, more clarity, and more confidence when it comes to your money. Our Chief Investment Officer, Colin Symons, now delivers his own daily newsletter, offering deep analysis and a detailed outlook on the ever-changing investment world called Symons Says. Check it out and subscribe if you want a very detailed, daily analysis of the investment world. Colin has amazing content.

Meanwhile, the LFG Daily will continue to bring you quick, actionable summaries — blending market updates with financial planning and tax strategies to help you make smarter decisions every day. Together, they’re the perfect one-two punch: Colin brings the deep dive into Investments, we bring the daily edge.

Luke Lloyd, CEO Lloyd Financial Group

Mutual Fund Share Classes: Why They Matter More Than You Think

When most people log into their 401(k) or review their investment statements, they focus on the fun stuff—performance, allocation percentages, and how close they’re getting to retirement. What often doesn’t get attention is just as important: the mutual fund share class you’re actually invested in.

It may sound like a technical detail, but share classes can significantly affect your long-term returns, the fees you pay, and the incentives behind an advisor’s recommendation. Not all share classes are created equal—and ignoring them could quietly cost you thousands over the course of your career.

Let’s break it down in plain English.

What Are Mutual Fund Share Classes?

Think of a mutual fund as a car. It’s the same engine, same horsepower—but different trims and price tags.

A-shares, B-shares, C-shares, I-shares, R-shares… these are all “trims” of the same underlying investment. They invest in the same stocks or bonds, but the cost structure is different. And as you know, in investing, costs matter. A lot.

A-Shares: The Upfront Commission Model

A-shares typically charge a front-end sales load, meaning a percentage of your investment goes to commissions before your money even hits the market.

• ✔ Lower annual internal fees

• ✘ Pay upfront (often 3%–5.75%)

• ✔ Works reasonably well for long-term investors

• ✘ Can be misused by commission-based advisors

• 
  

For example, if you contribute $10,000 into an A-share fund with a 5% load, only $9,500 gets invested on day one. Over a long investment horizon, reduced internal fees may offset that—but only if you stay in the fund for years.

B-Shares: The “Back-End” Trap

B-shares were designed to avoid the upfront hit of A-shares, but they come with their own baggage.

• ✔ No upfront fee

• ✘ Higher ongoing expenses

• ✘ Surrender charges if you sell early

• ✘ Eventually convert to A-shares

• 
  

These were extremely popular before regulations tightened, but today they’re largely phased out because they were notoriously confusing and often misaligned with the best interest of investors.

If you still see B-shares in a 401(k)… that’s a red flag.

C-Shares: The Never-Ending Fee

C-shares avoid front-end and back-end loads, but you pay for it indefinitely.

• ✔ No upfront or back-end charge

• ✘ Generally the highest ongoing expenses

• ✘ Not ideal for long-term investors

• ✔ More flexibility (no surrender schedule)

• 
  

C-shares work in short-term scenarios, but over long horizons—like a career-long 401(k)—you could be paying double or triple what you would in an institutional or advisory share class.

Why Share Classes Really Matter in Your 401(k)

Most 401(k) participants don’t realize they often have access to:

• R-shares (retirement share classes with varying fee levels)

• I-shares or institutional shares (lower fees)

• Target-date CIT equivalents (often cheaper than mutual funds)

• 
  

The problem? Not all plans automatically default to the lowest-cost version. Many plans still offer:

• Higher-fee R3 or R4 share classes instead of R5/R6

• C-shares leftover from outdated plan menus

• Funds with revenue sharing built into the fee

• 
  

And if you aren’t paying attention, you could unknowingly pick the most expensive version—even though identical, cheaper versions exist in the same plan lineup.

This is why fee audits matter. This is why fund menus matter. And this is why share class literacy is more than a technicality—it’s a retirement accelerator.

If Your Advisor Recommends A, B, or C-Shares… Pay Attention

In the modern advisory landscape:

• Fee-only advisors typically never use A-, B-, or C-shares

• Fiduciaries avoid share classes with commissions

• B-shares are nearly extinct due to regulatory scrutiny

So if you encounter:

• A-shares with large upfront loads

• C-shares in long-term portfolios

• Any B-shares at all

…it’s very reasonable to ask:

“Why this share class, and what are the total costs I’m paying?”

A good advisor will be transparent and can justify their recommendation. A conflicted advisor may dance around the question.

The Bottom Line: Your Money Deserves the Cheapest Version of the Same Thing

If there’s one rule of thumb to take away:

Always invest in the lowest-cost share class available to you—because it’s the exact same investment with better economics.

In 401(k)s, that’s often an institutional or retirement-class fund. In brokerage and advisory accounts, it’s typically institutional or no-load shares.

And if you’re working with an advisor, make sure the share class benefits you, not their commission schedule.

Don’t leave your financial future up to chance. Let’s build a plan that gives you confidence today and peace of mind for tomorrow. Click here to schedule a meeting — I’m here to help you take the next step toward financial freedom.

Colin Symons, CIO Lloyd Financial Group

The Fed cut rates by 25bps, as expected, in a 9-3 decision (Miran wanted a 50bps cut.) I’d say Powell was pretty balanced in his statement, as opposed to the hawkish expectations.

As I’d hoped, they are also restarting Treasury purchases, and starting right away at an elevated pace, with purchases of $40B of bill purchases a month. Everything went higher on that, with a pro-cyclical tilt.

The Employment Cost Index was 0.8% q/q vs. est. 0.9%. No huge deal, but another indication that inflation is calming down and less of a worry.

BoJ plans to raise rates by 25bps, this month.

Japanese bonds (JGBs) rose after 20Y bond auction had the highest demand in five years.

Oracle (ORCL) beat earnings but missed sales in a messy quarter but investors seemed to focus on cash burn over future sales, sending shares -11%. Cloud revenue was also a bit weak and capex is going to be high. That sent futures down.

Jobless claims, today.

What does it all mean? Restarting not-QE at the Fed strikes me as a bigger deal, but for now investors are choosing to worry about AI spend.

Don’t leave your financial future up to chance. Let’s build a plan that gives you confidence today and peace of mind for tomorrow. Click here to schedule a meeting — I’m here to help you take the next step toward financial freedom.

Disclosures/Regulation:

This content is intended to provide general information about Lloyd Financial. It is not intended to offer or deliver investment advice in any way. Information regarding investment services are provided solely to gain an understanding of our investment philosophy, our strategies and to be able to contact us for further information.

All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.

The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward‐looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.

Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk. Therefore, it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable